4 reasons par exists in disc golf

Let’s get this out of the way right from the get-go …

Here’s how the PDGA defines “par” in disc golf:

“Par is the score that an expert disc golfer would be expected to make on a given hole with errorless play under ordinary weather conditions.”

That’s fine and all, but what’s the big deal with par? At the end of the day, it’s strokes that matter. Everyone can count: Jot ‘em down, add ‘em up, turn ‘em in and presto – that was easy. Though painfully basic, why even flirt with adding more math to something that doesn’t require it?

DGPT: Chris Clemons

If you’ve asked these questions, breathe easy

The following are four answers:

1. It’s a measuring stick of sorts

This is the best reason.

The other three are all derived from it.

Par serves as a personal measuring stick of sorts for disc golfers to compare their play to what a clean, mistake-free round would look like. If yours is a mentality that prefers competing against the course, rather than the rest of the field, assuming it’s set correctly, par means a great deal.

Also, if you’ve never thrown a track before, par provides an instant idea of where your game needs to be to achieve a middle-of-the-pack result – in theory. Furthermore, with previous years’ scores recorded on the PDGA website, it can also give you the inside scoop on what’s needed to take home the top prize at a tournament you’re planning on playing in, even if you’re new to it.

That’s value.

2. It’s helpful for tournament directors

Deuce-or-die disc golf is …

Meh.

For fans, well-set pars give off an appearance of professionalism. As such, it’s no wonder tournament directors (TDs) are obsessed with making sure they cement theirs properly.

DGPT: Missy Gannon

Additionally, for detail-obsessed TDs seeking to improve their events year after year, relative to par, scoring anomalies give them an idea of where changes need to be made in the future. Was a crazy low or obscenely high score on a select few holes merely a one-off issue or a trend?

Par tells them – and quickly.

3. It’s great for building out a game plan

Again, the fewest throws wins …

Duh.

For the Pro Tour, though par isn’t an ideal score, it helps make that happen. For example, if there’s a hole that doesn’t favor a particular player’s game, par gives him (or her) a target score to minimize damage and move on. The inverse of that is true, too. During practice rounds, with the majority of the field purportedly playing at (or near) par, knowing when to attack is a cinch.

Inside the mind of a touring pro:

“This is where I’ll lose strokes; I’ll play for par. This is where I’ll gain them; I’ll get aggressive.”

Nuff said.

4. It’s capable of maintaining spectator interest

I’m a disc golf fan.

I can’t imagine watching the pros play without par.

It’d be torture.

For starters, with the Disc Golf Network showing me hole-by-hole pars during coverage, I’m able to better track my favorite players’ big-picture performances, as they rarely share a card.

Similarly, let’s say I’m NOT sitting in front of my television to watch some Pro Tour action. Using UDisc Live, when viewed through the lens of par, based solely on the numbers in front of me, I’m able to see who devoured a hole or had the hole devour them – this is awesome stuff.

Being a fan is one thing, but how about those poor commentators? With fewer (and smaller) numbers to deal with, delivering a better on-air product is a much simpler task, as there’s virtually no number-crunching, allowing the in-booth guys to more naturally speak.

Love you, Ian Anderson.

DGPT: Gavin Babcock

It pains me to say this …

Ball golf got par right.

Disc golf is wise to follow suit.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.

Have anything to add? Take to X to let us know – we’ll actually (for real) get back to you.

Editor’s Suggestions:

Real quick, if you happen to buy something through a link in this article, there’s a chance we’ll get a small share of the sale. It’s how we keep the lights on. To learn more, click here.

Photo of author

Lucas Miller

Lucas Miller is the founder and editor-in-chief of Green Splatter. When he’s not out tossing a Champion Rhyno in his native Utah, he’s watching true-crime documentaries with his wife, wrestling his twin boys and praying the Oklahoma City Thunder’s rebuild passes quickly.

8 thoughts on “4 reasons par exists in disc golf”

  1. Just want to commend you guys on your proof reading and editing abilities. Seems hard to read the news now days with out noticing some mistake that would of had my teachers scowl back in grade school. After over a year of reading this blog I can’t think of a time I found a typo or improper grammar.

    Just wanted to throw some praise your way!

    Reply
    • Thanks, Andy!

      My man, they are DEFINITELY in there …

      Google Docs. auto-corrects “understable” to “understandable,” which is annoying.

      And mistakes happen, but hey – we put our best (kind of) foot forward, at least.

      Thanks for the kind words!

      Reply
  2. Golf. Disc, ball, soccer, whatever is always about you vs the course. How do you know if you or the course won?

    Par.

    That’s it.

    Reply
    • Oh, you mean “soccer golf,” right?

      I think it’s called “foot golf,” but I might be wrong …

      For a second, I thought you were literally talking about “soccer,” which would make no sense, as you’re literally playing against another team.

      Now I get it 🙂

      Reply
    • Par is just a bunch of made up numbers. Seems like players are never happy with a course’s par… The only real number that counts is a player’s total score! You don’t say-‘I got 6 birdies, I win’… The winner has the lowest score. Just make everything a 3 and just play!

      Reply
  3. Par is needed in that it sets a standard. You can’t determine par by looking at average on a given hole as it’s almost always going to be a fraction (a hole playing under or over par). Obviously you can’t shoot a fraction. I don’t get the argument for people wanting to play strokes over par when essentially they’re the same thing. If we eliminate par and decide that a given hole is four strokes then that’s just renaming par. If the idea is to have no stroke count per hole and only the total strokes at the end of the round counted then that eliminates an important metric on how to judge a hole by a standard. Maybe I just don’t understand what the argument is

    Reply
    • It’s hard to understand, Joe, because it’s a dumb argument …

      And only people who like arguing choose to make it. Haha.

      Hey, I call ’em like I see ’em, right?

      Reply

Leave a Comment